Rise in extreme wildfires linked directly to emissions from oil companies in new study
Researchers set out to clearly quantify connection between companies, emissions and climate events
As fires blaze in Alberta, Saskatchewan and B.C., new research has drawn a direct and measurable link between carbon emissions traced back to the world's major fossil fuel producers and the increase in extreme wildfires across western Canada and the United States.
The peer-reviewed study (new window), published last week in the journal Environmental Research Letters (new window), found that 37 per cent of the total burned forest area in Western Canada and the United States between 1986-2021 can be traced back to 88 major fossil fuel producers and cement manufacturers.
What we found is that the emissions from these companies have dramatically increased wildfire activity, said Carly Phillips, co-author on the study and a researcher at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
The findings build on previous studies that have quantified the contribution of those same 88 companies to the increase in global temperatures, and others that have shown how a climate-driven
vapour pressure deficit (VPD) — a measure of the atmosphere's drying power — has contributed to the increased area of forest burned in Western Canada and the U.S.
Using modelling data, researchers were able to determine that emissions traced back to those 88 companies resulted in an additional 80,000 kilometres squared being burned. That's an area larger than the size of Ireland.
Energy industry responds to research
The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) responded to the study in an email to CBC News.
While our view may differ from the group who produced the study, what we can agree on is the need for continued work towards driving down greenhouse gas emissions, said CAPP spokesperson Jay Averill.
Canada's oil and natural gas industry is one of the largest investors in emissions reduction innovation in the country, Averill said, citing carbon capture and electrification programs.
Canadian companies have a role to play in reducing global carbon emissions by exporting more natural gas to countries who are relying on coal to power their economies, Averill added.
Jatan Buch, a research scientist at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (new window) at Columbia University (new window), said in an email the research provides
strong evidence of the impact of emissions traced back to specific fossil fuel companies.
Buch, who was not involved in the study, added that while research shows VPD is a leading driver in how far a wildfire spreads, other factors are also at play, including the precipitation and snowpack conditions early in the season, and the practices of prescribed burning and fire suppression.
WATCH | Why wildfire seasons are getting stronger and longer:
Why wildfire seasons are getting stronger and longer
John Vaillant has spent years investigating wildfires and the reasons today’s fires are more destructive. He uses photos and videos to show CBC’s chief correspondent Adrienne Arsenault what’s been happening.
Growing field of study
The research is part of a growing field of study known as attribution science, which attempts to measure how climate change directly affected recent extreme weather events.
Jennifer Baltzer, an associate professor in the department of biology at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, said it's becoming more common to see scientists make those connections.
Last year, there were a number of studies that directly attributed the increase in emissions and associated climate warming with the massive heat waves that hit Europe, said Baltzer, the Canada Research Chair in Forests and Global Change.
I think we're increasingly seeing scientists make stronger statements, which we need to be doing — stronger statements about the fact that, yes, these changes in climate are human-caused and they are driving these massive catastrophes that we're seeing around the world.
Baltzer, who was also not involved in the study, said the findings aren't surprising, given previous research.
But she said the data helps draw links between previous research and the emissions from the world's largest fossil fuel companies.
It's really important to demonstrate those links.
'The accountability piece'
Phillips said drawing those links was part of her motivation, especially given that recent (new window) research (new window)and investigations (new window)have found oil companies knew about the threat of climate change decades ago but downplayed the dangers.
Part of what this study does is show the linkages between these companies, their emissions and climate impacts, which will hopefully allow them to be held accountable for their fair share of the costs associated with wildfire, she said.
- ANALYSISCanadian forest fires are the latest costly climate disaster that public accounts fail to capture (new window)
I think the accountability piece for fossil fuel companies is really important and part of what makes this research unique. We know that historically industries have been held accountable for the risks of their products, whether it be tobacco or asbestos. And a big part of holding those companies accountable was research showing the linkages between their product and the impact.
Christina Noel, a spokesperson for the American Petroleum Institute, said in a statement:
The clear agenda of this group aside, America's oil and natural gas industry is focused on delivering affordable, reliable energy while reducing emissions.
Benjamin Shingler (new window) · CBC News